State and local government retirement systems surged by 35 percent over their last quarterly low point in 2009 to total $2.93 trillion as of the end of 2010. The National Association of State Retirement Administrators and the National Council on Teacher Retirement reported the findings in a recent brief.
The organizations say recent plan redesign efforts underway in virtually every state, as well as median returns of 13.1 percent for 2010, help explain the dramatic improvement.
“Discussions of pension funding should use these more recent figures instead of depressed asset values that are no longer accurate,” said Keith Brainard, research director for NASRA and the new issue brief’s author. “Out-of-date numbers create misleading impressions about the true financial condition of public pension plans and their state and local government sponsors.”
Brainard was referring to recent academic studies and media reports written in reference to the 2008-09 market decline. For example, a study published in 2010 by Joshua Rauh used asset values as of September 2009 to project pension fund exhaustion dates. However, aggregate public pension asset values on that date were 13 percent lower than at the end of 2010.
A similar study by Robert Novy-Marx and Joshua Rauh (“Public Pension Promises: How Big Are They, and What Are They Worth?”), estimates unfunded state pension liabilities to be some $3 trillion. This study is also based on market values as of June 30, 2009, yet combined public pension asset values have grown by nearly 25 percent since.
In addition to relying on depressed asset values, this Novy-Marx/Rauh study bases its estimates on the use of a discount rate equal to each state’s borrowing rate (typically four percent to five percent), rather than the plan’s expected rate of investment return (typically 7.5 percent to 8.5 percent).
“This expected return assumption is often characterized as overly-generous, but critics ignore actual investment performance, particularly over longer periods,” said Ronnie Jung, President of NCTR and Executive Director of the Texas Teachers Retirement System. “The last 10 years have been rough ones for the capital markets and public pension funds,” Jung conceded, “but public pension investment returns have actually exceeded their assumptions over the last 20- and 25-year periods. In addition, strong returns since the end of 2010 suggest that capital markets continue to recover and to increase public pension fund asset values.”
Nevertheless, many plans are looking at current assumptions for future returns and are making changes where appropriate, noted Michael Williamson, NASRA President and Deputy Director of the District of Columbia Retirement Board.
“The point is that focusing on outdated point-in-time numbers or other short-term measures for public pension plans can produce inappropriate, flawed conclusions about these plans’ true condition as well as their real impact on state and local government finances,” said Williamson.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
