Conceptually, investors are thought be more risk-tolerant at younger ages and more risk-averse as they age. In fact, this idea is built into many asset allocation strategies and provides the structure for target-date mutual funds. But is it still valid?

Based on recent data, financial advisors may want to reassess age-based risk exposures because younger investors are growing more risk-averse, while older investors are growing more risk-tolerant.

This finding is contained on page 27 of the 2011 Investment Company Fact Book published by the Investment Company Institute (ICI). You can access it here: www.ici.org/pdf/2011_factbook.pdf

|
  • In 1998, 30 percent of investors younger than age 35 said they were willing to take above-average or substantial risk. By 2010, the percentage had shrunk to 22 percent.

  • In 1998, 6 percent of investors age 65 or older said they were risk-takers. By 2010, the percentage had increased to 10 percent.

As the age gap narrows, keep in mind that there also is a gender gap. Surveys consistently show that women are less willing to take substantial risk than men. One age-based size clearly does not fit all investors' need for personal risk exposure.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.