Several weeks ago I reported on the fi360 conference session in which Fred Reish shared his thoughts on 408(b)(2) – the DOL's new Fee Disclosure Rule that becomes effective next week. Reish and others expressed the concern that bundled service providers are sending or planning to send naïve plan sponsors an avalanche of paper.
This week I wrote a story from the perspective of independent service providers responsible for reporting those fees to give 401(k) plan sponsors a sense of what they might see from this type of vendor. The differences are stark and may indicate a new marketing battleground that every 401(k) plan sponsor should be aware of.
First, let's start with the reality that every 401(k) plan sponsor has the fiduciary duty to do what's best for plan participants. We can argue later if all plan sponsors actually embrace this theory in practice, but we can all agree that, in theory, this is their primary function as a plan fiduciary.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.