The single greatest threat to democracy has always been the tyranny of the masses. It's why we have things such as the Bill of Rights and our system of checks and balances, among others.
It's addressed in The Federalist Papers—some of my favorite collegiate reading—referring to “the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.”
But it's Lord Acton's reference that holds more relevance today, I think, when he wrote in 1877's The History of Freedom in Antiquity: “The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections.”
I spent a lot of time this past weekend sifting through some of the old school writings that gave birth to this nation. (Is it me or were people smarter then? Or could they just write better?)
Oddly enough, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were two of my favorite founding fathers. Of course, their heated rhetorical rivalry is historic, as they straddled opposite paths on which they felt this country should follow. Reading them together helps keep me centered. I also refer to them both today because while so many politicos are quick to pledge allegiance to the founding fathers, they like to be a bit more selective when they actually cite them. So, I'll refer to both of these fine gentlemen.
Obviously, my eyes are on Washington, where the government sits idle.
Now, we suffer a tyranny of the minority: a couple dozen elected officials who believe their singular cause is the only cause, and it should be imposed on all of us, despite legal precedents to the contrary. It's that kind of Crusades talk that scares me more than your average corrupt politician.
Centrists such as me have become as much an “enemy of the state” as the opposition. Ironic, then, that a party so torn from the inside brooks no deviance from the party line. But we don't have to look any further than that streaking emperor to realize how fatal a lack of self-reflection can be.
But is this political apartheid any different than the economic one in which we already live? Our economy is run by a select 1 percent—why shouldn't our political establishment, as well?
Some experts have wondered if this political standoff threatens our very democracy. I suppose, in the most literal sense, it already does, since such a small cabal has managed to furlough nearly a million federal workers while casting such a dark shadow over the market that hundreds of thousands in the private sector will almost certainly follow.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.