Switzerland is a prime example of a system very similar to that being implemented through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act—and the elements that differentiate the Swiss system from PPACA might point to where we're headed.
Insurance coverage in Switzerland is privatized and mandatory for all Swiss citizens, who can choose between nearly 100 different private plans. The Swiss Federal Law on Compulsory Health Care, which dictates what must be covered, regulates the plans. Because there are so many to choose from, the prices for basic health insurance are affordable, and those who can't afford to buy health insurance because of low wages or unemployment receive subsidies they can use. About 99.5 percent of the Swiss population is insured.
Carriers in Switzerland aren't permitted to deny coverage based on age or pre-existing conditions—and they're also not allowed to make a profit from sales of the basic, compulsory plans offered to everyone. Carriers can, however, offer supplementary insurance plans, which provide perks for those who choose to pay more for one of these supplementary plans.
“With the premium plans, you can go to private hospitals, which are a little bit more expensive,” explains Peter Otto, a native of Switzerland and professor of information systems management in the graduate school of management at Union College. “You have a single room, and you always get treated by the senior doctors, but even the base plan has outstanding coverage. The premium plan is just for individuals who feel they want to have a five-star hotel accommodation treatment, so to speak.”
Despite the high quality of health care, the Swiss spend far less of their gross domestic product on health care than the United States. According to the World Health Organization, the United States spends 17.2 percent of its GDP on health care, compared with Switzerland's 10.8.
Regina Herzlinger, a professor of business administration at Harvard and expert on the Swiss model of health care, says she believes there are three reasons why Switzerland is able to keep its costs under control.
“One reason is there are more insurance companies, far more than we have,” she explains. “The second reason is it's consumer-driven, so people can shop and buy wherever they want as long as the insurance policies offer the required benefits. And because it's a real consumer-driven market, there's much more transparency than in an employer-driven market. The buyers want to know the price, and they get a lot of information about the product. And thirdly, all insurance policies have a deductible, so you can't get 100 percent insurance coverage.”
It sounds similar to what PPACA is doing for (or to) American insurance—but in the States, people who receive subsidies to purchase insurance must buy it through the exchanges; they don't have the option of taking the subsidies and buying a policy directly from the carrier. And cost transparency makes a big difference.
The Swiss also have true universal coverage, with everyone paying into the private plans, and that makes a difference, too.
“It's really hard to have a market without everybody participating,” Herzlinger adds. “Obviously, sick people are going to be much more interested in buying insurance than healthy people. Freedom to shop and true universal coverage are what we don't have, but I'm sure we'll move there.”
Dr. Otto notes that although health care consumers must pay an annual deductible for care received, there are no copays for office visits or emergency-room drop-ins, and Swiss citizens also can decide they'd rather pay a higher premium for a lower annual deductible—much like the various levels of insurance options available to consumers in the United States.
“You have the flexibility to determine your own out-of-pocket expenses based on your medical conditions,” he says.
However, annual out-of-pocket expenses are capped in Switzerland at 2,500 Swiss francs—about $2,700.
And for brokers, the gross margins in the Swiss system are vastly different.
“As we move more and more toward a Swiss-style system, the good news is that there will be more customers,” Dr. Herzlinger says. “The bad news is that the value per customer is lower.”
But she adds that for consumers, the advantages to a system that relies on private insurance are myriad.
“The doctors don't know if you're poor, and they don't even care, because you have the same insurance as everybody else,” she notes. “There are a lot of advantages to this financing system, and I think we're starting down the path toward getting there.”
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.