The electronic data revolution has been a blessing in many, many ways. It has had a few bumps in the road, to be sure. Data breaches in the systems of major retailers have put sensitive customer data at risk. We're all familiar with the communications monitoring and data sharing that has taken place between phone and internet providers and government agencies, which some of us find troublesome from a privacy standpoint. 

Theft of laptops, hacking of computers, and high-profile security leaks by so-called whistleblowers are further examples of the risks involved when information is stored electronically.

That said, very few of us would want to go back to paper shuffling and hard-copy transmission, storage and retrieval of information where we don't have to. 

Losing the electronic efficiencies we now almost take for granted would be like stabling a horse in the garage instead of a sedan or an SUV, and feeding hay and grain instead of gasoline. 

From internet banking and investing to online purchasing, just about any action or transaction you can name has – or likely soon will have – an electronic dimension or means to execute. I suspect that very few of us would really want to roll back the clock.  

 
The world of retirement plans is pretty comfortable with electronic functions, too.  A 401(k) plan participant can change investments, request a distribution, apply for a plan loan, and generally interact with their employer's plan at its web site with a few keystrokes. 
 
The tax return of a retirement plan, Form 5500, is typically submitted electronically to the Department of Labor on behalf of the sponsoring employer. The same is true of the information returns that track qualified plan and IRA transactions, Forms 1099-R and 5498 among them. 
 

But not all dimensions of retirement plan administration are as electronically streamlined as they could be. 

 
One example is what I believe to be the unnecessarily conservative posture of the Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration, which we know more familiarly by its acronym EBSA. 
 
In many electronic communication situations in the wider world there is a presumption that information will be delivered electronically. If a person wishes to receive that information in paper form, they must indicate this. 

If they fail to do so, they are "defaulted" to electronic delivery. This is the "new normal" in a great and growing share of communications in modern commerce.

Recommended For You

EBSA's preference – reflected in its regulations governing electronic delivery of retirement plan communications of many kinds – requires that plan participants and beneficiaries affirmatively declare their willingness to receive notices, election requests, summaries and other information, electronically.    

Many in our industry, myself included, believe EBSA should be more flexible and more in line with the rest of financial industry in this area. 

 
Given the inclination of many people to put off decision making, or to fail to take action simply out of inertia, it is likely that the lack of an election to receive communications electronically is not necessarily a rejection of that form of delivery. 
 
An argument often made in favor of more automatic enrollment and automatic escalation of deferrals in 401(k) plans – without affirmative election beforehand – is that people often simply fail to act, for no good reason and that this "negative" consent method results in increased participation.  
 
This same logic seems to apply to other plan related communication as well.
 

I'm not oblivious of the need for safeguards to avoid harming the interests of participants and beneficiaries who are unable or unwilling to receive plan communications in electronic form. 

 
Their rights must be protected, and not everyone chooses to do things in the most modern and up-to-date way. 
 
The option to request things in paper must be preserved. But it is worth noting that the IRS is onboard with a more streamlined, almost negative consent method for electronic delivery of some important plan communications. 

It's clear EBSA seems not to be. I believe EBSA should take another step into the modern electronic world and relax its current electronic delivery requirements.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.