A funny thing happened on the way to researching the article "The Big 401k Fiduciary Question: Target Date or Target Risk?"
I'd expected the usual complaints about target date funds, but, in the end, I also expected the financial professionals I interviewed to overwhelmingly endorse the use of TDFs. After all, as a group, who's more responsible for the success of TDFs than the financial service industry, the crowd responsible for so enthusiastically recommended them to 401(k) plan sponsors?
Not only was there a lack of consensus regarding preference, but I'd say there was, at most, an even split, if not a slight edge in favor of target risk funds. This got me wondering: Why would practitioners prefer TRFs when the "easy" choice would be to use the most popular flavor? Its clear TDFs present problems for investors (e.g., no consensus on what the "date" refers to and managing to a risk based on age rather than individual need, to name just two).
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.