Following the recommendation of the U.S. Solicitor General, the Supreme Court has said it will not review R.J. Reynolds' request to revisit a lower-court ruling against the tobacco company in a "reverse" stock-drop case brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Last December the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a District Court judgment and ruled in favor of participants in the company's 401(k) plans in a claim that dates back to its split from Nabisco in 1999.
The case struck at the heart of ERISA's prudent fiduciary standard, as well as whether fiduciaries or participants bear the burden of proving an investment decision prudent or not.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.