About half of U.S. MDs, and many nurse practitioners and physician assistants, wish their field could go back in time, before the advent of quality metrics and penalties for failure to meet certain national standards.
With the medical industry coming under increasing scrutiny for quality and cost performance, The Commonwealth Fund and the Kaiser Family Foundation decided to ask the caregivers what they thought about such matters. They were also asked whether advances in IT services made their jobs better or worse.
The study reported was divided into two categories: responses by physicians and the combined responses of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, despite the fact that the training received by NPs and PAs, and their job descriptions, are quite different from one another.
Here are some of the major findings of the study:
-
50 percent of primary care physicians say the increased use of quality metrics to assess provider performance is having a negative impact on quality of care, and 22 percent say it has a positive impact. Others either aren't sure or say it has no impact.
-
38 percent of NP and PA respondents cited metrics as a negative, and 27 percent as a positive.
-
52 percent of physicians say programs that impose financial penalties for unnecessary hospital admissions or readmissions are having a negative effect on quality of care, while 12 percent said such programs have a positive effect.
-
41 percent of nurse practitioners and physician assistants said penalties have a negative effect on their practice; 15 percent said it was positive.
-
50 percent of physicians said IT advances have had a positive effect on their practice; 28 percent said it was a negative.
-
64 percent of NP and PA respondents cited IT advances as a positive, with 20 percent saying it had negative effects on the practice.
-
Physicians viewed the increasing role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants as a negative trend in the industry. Meanwhile, NP and PA responses indicated they view this new collaborative trend much more positively.
-
55 percent of primary care physicians reported receiving financial incentives based on quality or efficiency measures, which the study authors called “an indication of the reach of ongoing efforts by public and private payers to reward providers for quality of care rather than for the amount of services delivered to patients.”
But these emerging trends aren't sitting well with many of the nation's primary caregivers, and early retirement now seems like a good idea to many. Some 47 percent of physicians and 27 percent of nurse practitioners and physician assistants agreed that they are considering retiring early as a result of the new paradigm in medical care.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.