For all of the arguments raised by the Department of Labor's proposed conflict-of-interest rule—938 formal comments have been posted online, the preponderance in opposition to the rule—the most obvious, and perhaps most damaging to opponents of the rule, has yet to be fleshed out, according to one RIA.
Not even the DOL has pointed out what Michael Kitces thinks ultimately proves the incoherence of the broker-dealer industry's core argument—that requiring all brokers to act as fiduciaries will prevent them from offering advisory services to low and middle-income savers.
The catch to that argument from Kitces' perspective: brokers are not now advisors, nor can they legally put themselves out as advisors, so how can the DOL's rule prevent them from offering what they now can't legally offer?
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.