Your high-income clients age 65 and up pay a federal income tax that doesn’t impact younger or less affluent people.

It’s the difference between their income-related Medicare Part B premiums and the basic premium.

For example: For a couple earning $175,000 per year, the income-related Part B premium in 2015 is $146.90 per person per month vs. $104.90 for the basic premium.

For this couple, therefore, the tax is $84 per month, $1,008 per year.

Since there will be no Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) in 2016, the basic Part B premium will be “held harmless” with no increase.

However, all income-related tiers are expected to see a 52 percent increase over 2015.

According to Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research (CRR), the monthly premium in the first income-related tier will rise from $146.90 to $223 per person per month.

In the highest income tier, for couples with income of more than $428,000, the premium will rise from $335.70 to $509.80. The annual tax on a couple in the highest tier will be $9,718 above the basic premium.

Only a small percentage of Medicare participants pay income-related premiums. So, why is their 2016 Part B premium skyrocketing, while it remains flat for most others?

The reason, says CRC, is that federal law prevents the basic Part B premium from rising for any year in which there is zero COLA in Social Security benefits to offset it.

Without this provision, the 2016 basic Part B premium would be $120.70 per month.

But since the Medicare trust fund is losing the difference between $120.70 and $104.90 per person per month for most participants, costs must rise more on high-income participants to keep the system solvent.

What can you do to help high-income retired clients cushion extra costs?

1. First, let them know higher Part B premiums are coming in 2016 and help them adjust budgets.

2. Secondly, it’s too late to reduce their modified adjusted gross incomes (MAGI) and move them into a lower income-related tier in 2016. Medicare usually looks back at MAGI as reported from the second previous year for this purpose--i.e., MAGI reported for the 2014 tax year determines 2016 premiums.

But you can help clients plan ahead. By taking steps now to reduce 2015 MAGI, you can hold down Part B premiums in 2017.

3. Finally, let clients know that this problem is cumulative. In any future year in which the COLA is zero, they will pay twice--first by not receiving any COLA and secondly by having to pay higher Part B premiums, to fill funding gaps caused by the hold-harmless benefit enjoyed by other retirees.

Emphasize that higher Medicare premiums are a selective federal income tax levied on only one segment of the population--high-income seniors. But it’s a tax that can be managed, to a degree, with planning.

Read CCR’s full report on No Social Security COLA Causes Medicare Flap, including projected 2016 Part B premiums for all income tiers for more information.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.