The dinner at The City Tavern in the Historic District of Philadelphia was excellent, but that’s all I can tell you.
Actually, I was allowed to report on the prepared remarks, and you can read them here: “Bogle: ‘New Fiduciary Rule is Just the Beginning’,” (FiduciaryNews.com, May 24, 2016). It was the juicy tidbits during dinner, though, that provided the evening’s most interesting fare.
But I can’t tell you about that.
I can’t tell you about the chance meeting with Meryl Streep.
I can’t tell you about the insightful question I asked. I can’t tell you the compelling answer.
That’s the dilemma of “off the record.” “Off the record” is great for journalists. We get to learn a lot about how the sausage is made. “Off the record” is not so great for the reader. It’s probably one of the reasons so many people hate reporters.
So, here’s what I can tell you. Phyllis Borzi answered the question the next day on the record in front of a live (and live-stream) audience. In case you missed it, the story starts here…
Every Monday I send out a newsletter to all FiduciaryNews.com subscribers highlighting the “Trending Topics” found in the previous week’s news stories. Based on a couple of articles, this week I posed the question “Is this the end of the Fiduciary Era?” You’d be surprised who read it. I know I was.
The newsletter generated several emails of concern.
Apparently, folks didn’t like the idea some of the targets of the DOL’s new fiduciary rule might have uncovered a way to comply with the letter of the rule while ignoring the spirit of the rule. (If you don’t think this is plausible, remember the DOL’s 2012 Fee Disclosure Rule where some service providers “complied” with the Rule by “disclosing” their fee via a printed URL somewhere on page 54 of a 99-page document.)
The truth is, there have been articles reporting this regarding the fiduciary rule.
On the record, before an assembly of fiduciary advocates on the occasion of the launch of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard’s “Campaign for Investors,” Phyllis Borzi answered the obvious question. Yes, the DOL is aware of this possible strategy among certain players of the industry.
She said firms had two teams. The first sought ways to defeat the rule. The second was tasked with the job of discovering the best way to “comply” (in the 2012 Fee Disclosure manner) with the rule.
Rest assured, the DOL is on it.
There, you didn’t miss anything.
Except a superb Early American dinner.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.