There’s a reason why 401(k) plans took off in popularity in the 1980s.

Sure, you could say it was because of the increased tax benefits for both employees and employers. And, yes, you can also point to how they enabled people to save for retirement at a faster rate than they could in IRAs. Plus, there was free money in the company match! Nope.

All those reasons might be good, but they don’t explain the sudden jolt in popularity of what would normally be considered just another employee benefit.

Many readers might be too young to remember, but the 1980s began an extended era of the reign of the individual investor. With the rise of the stock market, everyone and his brother wanted to get in on the action. And, with 401(k) plans, everyone and his brother (as well as his sister) did get into the market.

Here’s why.

Forty years ago, traditional profit-sharing plans had a problem when it came to long-term investing. For those baby boomers just starting off on their careers, these retirement plans were invested too conservatively for their tastes.

They wanted to be more aggressive, and 401(k) options increasingly gave them that opportunity, especially when the Modern Portfolio Theory-Style Box approach took over the industry in the 1990s. The investment industry focused on creating and selling more and more asset classes to fill the ever expanding style box.

Retirement savers were convinced this was in their best interest, and for ten years or so, they rode the bull market of investment invincibility.

But the market always gets the last laugh. The “Lost Decade” immediately following Y2K stunned retirement savers. They were forced to accept they were more lucky than good when it came to picking investments. Many retreated to the comfort of simply not opening their 401(k) statements.

When the dust settled, employees saw a new option in their plans, the target-date fund. This was the “One Portfolio” solution that marked the return of the traditional profit sharing plan age-based investment option. Of course, this came with a twist on that old-fashioned idea. Instead of all workers being placed in a common pool managed to the weighted average age, today groups of workers can choose the specific investment pool based on their actual age.

Alas, with the return of age-based funds comes the return of some of the same problems we saw in the original version (see “401k Plan Sponsors Need to Know the Good, the Bad, and Why TDFs are So Popular,” FiduciaryNews.com, March 14, 2017).

The fundamental flaw with TDFs – the same fundamental flaw of all mutual funds – creates a hole large enough for the reemergence of the MPT-Style Box.

The attraction of the “One Portfolio” solution (e.g., TDFs) is that it allows retirement savers to ignore investment decisions – something they can’t control and which they are generate less expert in – and concentrate more on saving – something they can control and have immediate practical knowledge on.

This focus allows employees to maximize their retirement saving, which is in their best interest.

Unfortunately, TDFs aren’t the perfect investment for anyone (like I said, no mutual fund is).

Like those profit-sharing plans of old, TDFs, despite the promise of age-based specificity, are either too conservative or too aggressive.

To remedy this, there’s a quite logical conclusion to address the best interest of the retirement saver and tweak the overall asset allocation of their portfolio by adding asset specific funds to the standard TDF holding.

If this sounds like the MPT-Style Box’s nose peeking under the tent, consider yourself forewarned.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Christopher Carosa

Chris Carosa has been writing a weekly article and monthly column for BenefitsPRO online and BenefitsPRO Magazine since 2011 and is a nationally recognized award-winning writer, researcher and speaker. He’s written seven books, including From Cradle to Retire: The Child IRA; Hey! What’s My Number? – How to Increase the Odds You Will Retire in Comfort; A Pizza The Action: Everything I Ever Learned About Business I Learned By Working in a Pizza Stand at the Erie County Fair; and the widely acclaimed 401(k) Fiduciary Solutions. Carosa is also Chief Contributing Editor of the authoritative trade journal FiduciaryNews.com and publisher of the Mendon-Honeoye Falls-Lima Sentinel, a weekly community newspaper he founded in 1989. Currently serving as President of the National Society of Newspaper Columnists and with more than 1,000 articles published in various publications, he appears regularly in the national media. A “parallel” entrepreneur, he actively runs a handful of businesses, including a small boutique investment adviser, providing hands-on experience for his writing. A trained astrophysicist, he also holds an MBA and has been designated a Certified Trust and Financial Advisor. Share your thoughts and story ideas with him through Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/christophercarosa/)and Twitter (https://twitter.com/ChrisCarosa).