The top-ranking Democrat on the Senate side of the Joint Economic Committee says expanding the health savings account program would do little to help ordinary Americans cope with cuts in Affordable Care Act coverage expansion programs.
Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., makes the case against seeing HSA expansion as a substitute for ACA coverage expansion programs in a response to the House Republicans' American Health Care Act proposal.
The AHCA proposal would wind down the ACA Medicaid expansion program and replace the income-based ACA premium tax credit with an age-based premium tax credit. Drafters have tried to compensate for that by letting people contribute more to HSAs. Lawmakers could propose additional HSA program expansion provisions as the proposal makes its way through the House and the Senate.
People who combine HSAs with high-deductible health coverage that meets HSA program standards can avoid paying federal income taxes on contributions to the accounts, or on the withdrawals used to pay for eligible health care products and services.
The 2017 HSA contribution limits are $3,400 for an individual and $6,750 for a family.
Heinrich argues that the AHCA proposal to increase the maximum HSA contribution limit would do little good for ordinary families, because ordinary families have no way to max out their HSAs, even under the current limits.
"Only 53 percent of American families save at all, and families who are wealthier are more likely to be able to save," Heinrich writes. "Less than half of low- and middle-income families are able to save."
An individual would have to save $214 per month for a year to cover the cost of a year of treatment for Type 1 diabetes, and $508 per month for a year to cover the cost of an appendectomy, Heinrich writes.
U.S. Treasury Department figures show that even families with annual gross income of $100,000 to $200,000 have an average of less than $5,000 in their HSAs, according to a chart accompanying the commentary.
The only taxpayers with an average HSA balance of more than $8,000 are those with more than $500,000 in annual income, according to the chart.
HSAs "allow Republicans to claim they provide families freedom of choice, while providing another way for the wealthiest among us to pay less," Heinrich writes.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Allison Bell
Allison Bell, a senior reporter at ThinkAdvisor and BenefitsPRO, previously was an associate editor at National Underwriter Life & Health. She has a bachelor's degree in economics from Washington University in St. Louis and a master's degree in journalism from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. She can be reached through X at @Think_Allison.
