A research brief from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College finds that a measure intended to help older workers find work—especially in smaller firms—wasn’t much help.
Limiting the premiums insurers could charge for health insurance on workers in smaller firms, a provision put forth by most states during the 1990s, was intended to benefit both workers and firms—the former, in being able to find employment and at better pay; the latter, in not being hit with more expensive health insurance premiums across the board for their employees.
Recommended For You
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
