Either way, politics relies on PR and optics. So, is unbridled euphoria really the best note to strike after the first step for a bill that barely squeezed through and still faces an extremely murky future? A bill which has produced concern and criticism and could remove health care coverage for millions along with popular essential health benefits.

And it's hard to ignore statements made by GOP members about the passage of the ACA. For example:

• “Will Speaker Pelosi Wait for the 'Final Number' from the CBO?” House GOP Twitter handle, 2010

• “I don't think we should pass bills that we haven't read that we don't know what they cost.” Paul Ryan, July 2009

• “Congress and the White House have focused their public efforts on platitudes and press conferences, while the substance and the details have remained behind closed doors.” Paul Ryan, July 2009

To be sure, less-than-flattering reactions crossed the aisle, with House Dems singing “nah nah nah, hey hey hey, goodbye,” implying that fallout from the vote could affect 2018 midterms. As Congress members tally victories or chide opponents, millions are left wondering about the health of themselves and their families.

Shortly after the vote, journalist and former news anchor Dan Rather wrote, “There will be no end to the speculation of how this will affect the political fortunes of the two major parties. And on that front, frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. I worry for my fellow citizens for whom the burden of health will now be compounded by the burden of injustice.” I think this sentiment echoes the concerns of many.

Amidst numerous optical illusions, it's important to stay focused on what really matters.