Plan sponsors’ year-end review can prompt worries – Carosa
Believe it or not, anxiety is a healthy condition – for both retirement plan sponsors and plan participants.
They say a bull market climbs a wall of worry. That might lead one to the conclusion that, contrary to popular belief, worrying is actually a good thing. In fact, if you’re a plan sponsor, worrying is not only a good thing, it’s a proactive method for keeping yourself out of trouble.
We’re in the final stretch of the year, and that means it’s that time when business executives reflect back on the past twelve months. Those responsible for the company’s 401(k) plan may find themselves feeling anxious (see “7 Concerns on the Forefront of 401k Plan Sponsors’ Minds Right Now,” FiduciaryNews.com, November 27, 2018). And that’s not a bad thing. Here’s why.
Most plan sponsors don’t think “401(k),” “ERISA,” or “Retirement” on a 24/7 basis. Rather, their 24/7 world consists of production efficiencies, sales quotas, and profit margins.
When they finally do turn their filled-to-capacity attention to the 401(k) plan, they have more questions than answers: Do we have the right policies? Should we allow hardship withdrawals? Has the plan document been updated to comply with the latest regulations? Are we doing enough to help our employees retire comfortably? And, most important, how much liability am I really exposing myself to?
The lack of answers to questions like these breeds uncertainty. And uncertainty breeds anxiety.
That’s normal and that’s good. It’s good for the plan sponsor, and it’s good for the plan participant. It virtually guarantees alignment of the best interests of both parties.
A plan sponsor who worries about the plan is more likely to try to alleviate those worries. This means double-checking various areas of concern. Companies accomplish this either through dedicated personnel (if they’re large enough) or through third-party providers.
In either case, plan sponsors worry enough to understand the value of relying on someone who is looking at all the factors involving the plan on a 24/7 basis. Such reliance reduces the likelihood of a significant error.
In an ironic twist, the actions resulting from excess anxiety can result in reduced anxiety. In other words – and this is where the irony comes in – you can’t dampen down your worry unless you are worried in the first place.
Maybe it’s easier to understand this by imagining the opposite took place. Suppose, instead of being overly concerned about their 401(k), plan sponsors were apathetic. They simply don’t care about it. Because they don’t care, they don’t hire competent service providers. Because they don’t care, they don’t adopt policies that increase the odds their employees will retire in comfort. Because they don’t care, they don’t keep their plan in compliance with the current DOL and IRS rules.
What do you get from an apathetic plan sponsor? A mess. The kind of mess Mr. Schlichter and his tort-attorney buddies constantly search for.
That’s not a good thing for plan sponsors, primarily because it’s not a good thing for plan participants.
Can you see why we should encourage plan sponsors to worry more? It’s the best way to spur them to embrace the actions that will most protect them as well as their employees.
READ MORE:
How can plan sponsors know what they don’t know?
Can you speak ‘plan sponsor speak’? 3 communications tips for advisors