The ruling comes as the Supreme Court debates whether protections for LGBT individuals are protected from employment discrimination. (Photo: Shutterstock)
Transgender protections created under the Obama administration continue to be unraveled by the Trump administration. The latest: protections requiring insurers and providers to provide treatment regardless of sex or gender identity.
Opponents argued that the rule would force doctors to perform procedures and insurers to cover services they didn't agree with. On Tuesday, Judge Reed O'Connor–thrust in the spotlight last December for his ruling on the ACA–agreed. Judge O'Connor ruled that the regulation was a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed in 1993 to protect religious freedom.
Related: Lawsuits pave the way for transgender insurance coverage
The current Department of Health and Human Services elected not to defend the rule.
The ruling, which will likely be appealed, comes as the Supreme Court debates whether protections for LGBT individuals are protected from employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Read more:
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.