The realistic picture of retirement costs? It's bleak
The true cost of retirement living is higher than people are being led to believe, an index created by researchers shows.
How much will people have to get by on in retirement? Have they saved enough? If they haven’t, will they still get by?
According to a report in The Conversation, the true cost of retirement living is higher than people are being led to believe (even if they are feeling panicked about the cost of health care as they age), and a new scale of accounting for how much money seniors will need to live independently in retirement paints a bleak picture.
A team at the University of Massachusetts Boston has devised the Elder Index, a measure of how much income older people need to maintain independence and meet their daily living costs while staying in their own homes.
According to Jan Mutchler, Professor, Department of Gerontology, McCormack Graduate School Director, Center for Social and Demographic Research on Aging, Gerontology Institute, University of Massachusetts Boston, the index is “based on the bare-bones budgets of singles and couples aged 65 or over.”
Mutchler adds, “For 2019, we found that the average income needed by an older individual in rental housing to meet all basic needs was $25,416, and for a couple in rental housing it was $36,204. The index breaks this figure down county by county.”
In addition, the index differs from the federal poverty line in that the latter is “way below what an adequate lifestyle requires,” Mutchler says in the report. The Elder Index instead “defines economic security as the income level at which older people can cover basic and necessary living expenses without relying on loans, gifts or income support programs like food subsidies and housing assistance. It is also uniquely focused on thresholds specific to older adults’ expenses.”
It’s a big problem, Mutchler says, explaining that “in 2019, half of older Americans living on their own lacked the income needed to pay for their basic needs, as did 23 percent of couples. Taken together, we estimate that more than 10 million people aged 65 or older and living independently have incomes below the Elder Index.”
There is, after all, no “family plan” in Medicare, which means that each half of a couple is on the hook for a full individual premium. And other senior expenses aren’t necessarily lessened by economies of scale, either, with the people most at risk including women and people of color, who have been running behind, moneywise, all their lives.
The index is intended not just to shape policy regarding such elder supports as Social Security, health care policy, housing needs and retirement savings goals, but also to serve as a guide for financial planning for retirement in a way that will ward off poverty. More discussion is needed by families about how to save and plan for retirement, but that discussion needs to be based on more accurate information about what’s actually needed—something the index can help to provide. Currently, the report says, people are not adequately informed about how much they’ll need to live on.
Subsidies and benefits for elders need to be expanded, Mutchler points out, since “typically the only people eligible are at or very near poverty levels, rather than being economically insecure.” Communities also need to consider affordable senior housing and the necessity of making sure that seniors receive the benefits that are available.
READ MORE: