Calculating Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) retirement contributions

Let’s plan for the worst (no guidance from Treasury) and hope for the best. Meanwhile, here are some ideas to consider.

(Photo: Shutterstock)

We are getting a lot of questions regarding the amount of retirement contributions paid during the qualifying period for the forgiveness calculation. This is in regards to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) in the recent CARES Act:

Will a contribution for the 2019 plan year count toward forgiveness? Will a contribution for a full year count, or will some proration apply to account for the 8/52 weeks concept?

You can imagine the complexities of this concept: Who’s to know that a contribution made during the qualifying period is the only contribution that will be made for the year? Even if you know that the contribution would be the only one for 2020, you can’t really prorate it because you won’t yet know total qualifying compensation for 2020.

If they attempt to limit you to 8/52 of the 2019 contribution, what if you had multiple plans (e.g., 401k and ESOP) but terminated one during or after 2019?

What if you adopted a plan during or after 2019? What if your qualifying payroll changed materially during or after 2019?

What if contributions are discretionary and you decided not to make a contribution for 2019 or have not yet made a contribution for 2019, but intend to do so for 2019 and/or 2020?

If you have more than one plan, will it be necessary to contribute to both plans in order to maximize your forgiveness eligibility? It seems that should not be necessary: If you make a 2020 contribution of $400,000 to retirement, why should it matter whether all of that goes to ESOP, or part to ESOP and part to profit sharing or 401k match, regardless of the proration of any 2019 contribution?

It seems possible that the complexities are such that Treasury/SBA will simply allow any retirement contribution paid during the qualifying period to count, but we don’t have any guidance yet, so there are no answers to these questions.

Treasury Secretary Mnuchin has been quoted as telling a Senate committee at yesterday’s hearing, “I thought the guidance we put out dealt with all the issues.”

Mnuchin indicated he would answer the committee’s specific questions received from constituents but did not say those answers would be widely available. Therefore, it is not clear what additional guidance might be issued.

Let’s plan for the worst (no guidance) and hope for the best. In that regard, our advice is the following:

1. Estimate and continue to monitor:

2. Ask your board of directors (via a meeting or unanimous consent) to adopt a resolution that authorizes the officers to make retirement contributions during the qualifying period up to a stated maximum. If you have more than one plan, authorize the officers to decide the portion of the total retirement contribution to be contributed to each plan, including the ability to allocate all of it to one plan, and authorize them to determine the extent to which the contribution(s) are for 2019 or 2020.

3. Delay making the contribution(s) until the end of the qualifying period, to allow maximum time to receive guidance.

4. In the meantime, continue to monitor the estimated Maximum Retirement Contribution for PPP Forgiveness.

5. Also in the meantime, estimate and monitor the Minimum Retirement Contribution you will need to make for 2019 and 2020, such as for committed (but as yet unpaid) 2019 and 2020 matching contributions to a 401(k), contributions to fund ESOP loan payments, and contributions for ESOP repurchase liability. Let’s call the sum of that the “Minimum Retirement Contribution.”

6. Monitor Treasury/SBA guidance to assist you in determining the amount to contribute.

7. If you have an ESOP and either another plan or another non-ESOP source within the ESOP plan, consider prioritizing making the contribution first to the ESOP, up to the amount you would intend to use for ESOP loan payment and ESOP repurchase liability, since those are amounts you will need to contribute anyway. Or, if you are committed to pay a match and have a known amount of matching obligation, then it would be equally effective to designate the contribution as being for that match.

8. If no guidance is forthcoming, consider the following:

Mark Welker is a Kansas City-based partner with Husch Blackwell LLP. He leads the firm’s Employee Stock Ownership Plans group. If you have questions about calculating the maximum contribution for a year, drafting board resolutions, or monitoring our e-blasts about guidance, let us know.