America's Health Insurance Plans is calling on more government support to cover the cost of COVID-19 tests, which it says could be between $6 billion and $25 billion annually. (Photo: Shutterstock)
The COVID-19 pandemic has created a lot of confusion for employers (and everyone else, for that matter), including what they can and can't ask about employees' personal health, as well as what screening measures they can legally implement. Many employers have opted to make COVID-19 testing a requirement for employees returning to work, raising another question: who's responsible for paying for such tests?
The Department of Health and Human Services, in conjunction with the Department of Labor, and Department of the Treasury states, this week released new guidance that answers this question and many others.
The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), as well as the CARES Act, both included provisions related to cost-sharing for COVID-19 treatments and tests. Among them was a requirement that insurers cover the cost of testing–but only when ordered by an individual's health care provider.
According to the guidance, "testing conducted to screen for general workplace health and safety (such as employee "return to work" programs), for public health surveillance for SARS-CoV-2, or for any other purpose not primarily intended for individualized diagnosis or treatment of COVID-19 or another health condition is beyond the scope of section 6001 of the FFCRA."
Insurers may opt to pay for such tests anyway, as a precautionary measure. America's Health Insurance Plans, however, is calling on more government support to cover the costs, which it says could be between $6 billion and $25 billion annually.
The guidance also addresses the issue of balance billing related to testing. While the CARES Act is clear in its prohibition of balance billing for testing, the guidance notes that "section 3202(a) of the CARES Act does not preclude balance billing for items and services not subject to section 3202(a), although balance billing may be prohibited by applicable state law and other applicable contractual agreements."
In addition, the guidance also clears the way for large employers to offer telehealth benefits to employees not eligible for employer-sponsored health insurance. "In light of the critical need to minimize the risk of exposure to and community spread of SARS-CoV-2, for the duration of any plan year beginning before the end of the public health emergency related to COVID-19, the Departments are providing relief for a group health plan (and health insurance coverage offered in connection with a group health plan) that solely provides benefits for telehealth or other remote care services from the group market reforms under part 7 of ERISA, title XXVII of the PHS Act, and chapter 100 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
"This relief is limited to telehealth and other remote care service arrangements that are sponsored by a large employer (as defined under section 2791(e)(2) of the PHS Act) and that are offered only to employees (or their dependents) who are not eligible for coverage under any other group health plan offered by that employer."
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Emily Payne
Emily Payne is director, content analytics for ALM's Business & Finance Markets and former managing editor for BenefitsPRO. A Wisconsin native, she has spent the past decade writing and editing for various athletic and fitness publications. She holds an English degree and Business certificate from the University of Wisconsin.
