The new suit, Scott v. UnitedHealth Group, was brought by an employee at AT&T as well as an employee at CenturyLink, arguing on behalf of thousands of their fellow employees. (Photo: Shutterstock)
UnitedHealth is once again in hot water over its practice of pushing the cost of payment disputes onto its employer-group clients. A new class-action lawsuit accuses the health insurance giant of passing on more than $1 billion in costs to employers each year through a practice called "cross-plan offsetting."
The company faced a similar lawsuit last year, when the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the practice was in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
The new suit, Scott v. UnitedHealth Group, was brought by an employee at AT&T as well as an employee at CenturyLink, arguing on behalf of thousands of their fellow employees. "By engaging in cross-plan offsetting, United treats the thousands of Plans it administers as one extremely large piggybank, moving more than $1.2 billion among its Plans each year to suit its own interests," the complaint states. "Each cross-plan offset violates ERISA, and in most cases, the money ends up in United's own pocket."
"It's inexcusable that the UnitedHealth Group would shave money off my hard-earned paycheck to line its own pockets," said plantiff Royce Klein. " When I'd see deductions in my paycheck, I trusted them to have my best interest in mind, and instead, they took advantage of my co-workers and me. My hope is by filing this lawsuit that UnitedHealth Group will be exposed for taking advantage of hard-working Americans in a similar situation and be forced to put an end to this diabolical scheme."
Through the practice of cross-plan offsets, UnitedHealth allegedly has been overcharging self-funded health plans and using the excess funds to cover the costs of other plans' disputed payments.
"That kind of mixing of plan assets is incompatible with United's fiduciary duties to each of its separate plans and runs afoul of ERISA at every turn," Karen Handorf, a partner at law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll, said in an email. "We are confident that our approach will be successful in finally bringing United's blatantly unlawful practice to an end."
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Emily Payne
Emily Payne is director, content analytics for ALM's Business & Finance Markets and former managing editor for BenefitsPRO. A Wisconsin native, she has spent the past decade writing and editing for various athletic and fitness publications. She holds an English degree and Business certificate from the University of Wisconsin.
