Medicare for All gets a renewed push

Progressive Democrats are reviving their Medicare for All plan.

By Jarrell Dillard | March 18, 2021 at 10:27 AM

Medicare for all sign President Joe Biden has stopped short of supporting Medicare for All, saying he prefers to expand the Affordable Care Act. (Photo: Shutterstock)

(Bloomberg) –Progressive Democrats are reviving their Medicare for All plan this week, part of a push for universal health coverage they say is even more urgent after the coronavirus pandemic exposed and exacerbated disparities in the U.S. health-care system.

The bill has little chance of passing this Congress with Republicans and moderate Democrats opposing its wide reach, but the measure lays out progressive priorities for transforming a health care system worth nearly a fifth of U.S. gross domestic product. The plan would eliminate private health insurance and require the federal government to establish a single-payer program that covers all U.S. residents.

Recommended For You

Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington State, the head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and one of the bill's sponsors, said the American public increasingly supports a larger role for government in health care.

"While this devastating pandemic is shining a bright light on our broken, for-profit health care system, we were already leaving nearly half of all adults under the age of 65 uninsured or under-insured before Covid-19 hit," Jayapal said. "And we were cruelly doing so while paying more per capita for health care than any other country in the world."

President Joe Biden has stopped short of supporting Medicare for All, saying he prefers to expand the Affordable Care Act. But advocates for a more comprehensive approach say overhauling the entire system in one piece of legislation would yield more savings and provide better outcomes for patients.

"It would be a tough lift in the Senate, but it's an important time to be laying the groundwork," said Eagan Kemp, a health-care policy advocate for Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy nonprofit. "Passing Medicare for All at once is sort of the most advantageous because you then get all of those savings, but we also support improvements in the health care system."

The limitations of the American health system have been especially apparent during the global pandemic. Millions of people were left without health insurance when they lost their jobs. Unequal access to care contributed to the pandemic's disproportionate impact on communities of color.

"The speed at which countries like Taiwan and New Zealand were able to respond — and the much higher death and infection rates that we have over comparably wealthy countries, all of which have some sort guaranteed health-care system — for us really highlights why this debate is so crucial right now," Kemp said.

Opponents argue that a single-payer model would increase wait times and lower the quality of care, in addition to the necessary increase in taxes and government spending. Shifting the full health-care burden to the federal government would cost more than $30 trillion over 10 years, according to some estimates, although advocates say total health spending could decrease in a centralized system that could negotiate drug prices and cut administrative costs.

Even though the U.S. spends more on health care than any other country in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, life expectancy has decreased in recent years, according to a 2019 report.

Premiums rise

And costs for consumers continue to increase. Annual premiums for employer-sponsored family heath coverage rose 55% over the past decade, to $21,342 in 2020 with workers paying $5,588 toward the cost, according to a survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Representative Debbie Dingell, a Michigan Democrat and another Medicare for All sponsor, criticized the current U.S. system that she said "prioritizes profits over patients and ties coverage to employment."

"Medicare For All will build an inclusive health care system that won't just open the door to care for millions of our neighbors, but do it more efficiently and effectively than the one we have today," Dingell said. "Now is not the time to shy away from these generational fights, it is the time for action."

Read more:

Copyright 2021 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

By Allison Bell | April 18, 2025

Affordable Care Act public exchange activities would have to rely on user fees and other program revenue.

HHS-leaked document indicates HealthCare.gov will still exist in 2026

By Caitlin Moling | April 18, 2025

The growing chasm in customer experience begs the question: What are the top health plans doing well that the lowest-ranked plans cannot seem to get right?

Poor communication fuels health plan dissatisfaction

By Allison Bell | April 18, 2025

Andrew Witty hopes a new executive order will lead to a review of all players in the sector.

UnitedHealth CEO objects to critics' 'obsession' with PBMs' role in drug supply chain
How One Employer Helped 1 in 3 Employees Improve Blood Pressure link

Case Study

Sponsored by Labcorp

High blood pressure affects nearly half of U.S. adults, increasing the risk of heart disease and stroke. This case study explores how an employer-sponsored wellness program helped approximately 1 in 3 employees improve their blood pressure risk level.

Reducing Employee Onboarding Time and Solving Staffing Challenges link

Case Study

Sponsored by Labcorp

Long onboarding times and staffing shortages create costly delays. Discover how one large healthcare system streamlined its hiring process, reducing onboarding time from weeks to days while improving the candidate experience and freeing up internal staff.

Opt In or Opt Out: Solving the Problem of Low Employee Engagement in Passive Voluntary Benefit Enrollments link

White Paper

Sponsored by Trustmark Voluntary Benefits

Voluntary benefit elections are not what they used to be. The shift toward passive enrollments prevents employees from being actively engaged in the enrollment process, generating low participation rates and putting employers and insurers at risk. This guide explores a new approach to enrollment that combines facets of both traditional enrollment processes and the new self-service culture to increase engagement and boost participation.