Deliver what matters: The value on investment of employee mental health programs

It’s time to stop chasing the ROI of employee mental health and instead consider a progressive alternative: VOI.

Whatever is negatively affecting one area of an employee’s life has the potential to effect others and have a direct impact on their mental health and job performance. (Photo: Shutterstock)

Until recently, employee mental health was frequently an afterthought: a check-the-box benefit hidden under wellness and “whole employee” products, wrapped up in a nice, tidy box under the Employee Assistance Program. But the pandemic forced a culture shift that’s here to stay.

Benefits brokers can remain trusted advisors, retain clients, and attract even more new business when they realize what this trend means and how to help clients quantify its worth. They can also gain traction with the C-suite and be better equipped to demonstrate the worth of employee mental health programs.

Related: Infographic: The employee mental health crisis is coming

Dr. Nick Taylor is CEO and co-founder of Unmind, the authoritative, trusted workplace mental health platform. Throughout his career, Dr. Taylor has always worked in mental health.

In the last few years, employee and employer expectations around benefits and support for employees have been shifting. The pandemic took all of that up a very large notch. As feeling 100% on top of our game seemed to become a far-off dream, benefits aimed at supporting total employee wellbeing moved from nice-to-have to a necessity for companies seeking to support their employees and continue appealing to job seekers, clients, and prospects. Wellness itself nearly became a luxury. Who has time to call the Employee Assistance Program line when you’re busy homeschooling your kids, caring for your elderly parents, and expected to meet that next work deadline?

Despite all that, the challenge still plaguing leaders in HR and benefits is how to quantify return on investment (ROI) for many voluntary benefits, including employee mental health solutions. It’s time to stop chasing the ROI of employee mental health and instead consider a progressive alternative that makes more sense: value on investment (VOI), measured in four company attributes.

As Canopy Health, the physician- and hospital-owned medical network defines it, VOI “better reflects the broader financial impact wellness programs can have on an organization.” They argue — and we agree — that the value of a wellness solution can be measured in qualitative business attributes, including:

Break it down and you’ll see that all of those organizational attributes roll up to four overarching, critical business outcomes, and the value of each grows with a proactive mental health program that supports every employee and the entire employee experience.

The value starts with a whole-person, whole-organization approach

A mental health solution that starts with a clinically based approach to employee mental health treats the whole person proactively and provides self-assessments, tools, and support for every worker, not just the 1 in 5 Americans with reported mental health concerns. As a result, the whole organization is reached and positively affected.

The whole-person approach — and the best value of an optimal employee mental health solution — addresses all three spheres of the human condition:

Translation: Whatever is negatively affecting one sphere of an employee’s life has the potential to affect the other two and have a direct impact on their mental health and job performance. So the next question is: What influences those three spheres of the human experience? What aspects of daily life nourish them and lead to mental wellbeing — and how can a mental health solution support that? Consider these seven aspects of well-being:

If one or more of these areas is off-kilter, it can damage work performance. If not addressed, it can create a ripple that potentially harms a company’s culture and reputation. Meanwhile, most traditional employee mental health programs fall short of engaging the employee. Employee Assistance Program (EAP) use is remarkably low at 3% to 5%.

Maybe that’s because employee mental health can’t take a “one size fits all” approach. Brokers need to offer, and employers need to look for, a partner platform that offers expert guidance, scientifically backed tools, data-driven outcomes, and a proactive approach — accessible resources and tools that inspire anyone in the workforce to self-assess and take action to be their best selves.

But how do you prove the business value of all of that?

4 business outcomes that prove the value of employee mental health investment

Moving past ROI and into the VOI of employee mental health starts with setting a baseline and considering a company’s current employee wellbeing goals. The questions seem easy enough to answer:

Regardless of how you answered those two questions, employers all share a common denominator: A wise investment in a mental health solution will reveal itself in four business areas that are critical to any organization and have measurable outcomes.

An optimal mental health platform will emphasize the message that employees don’t come to work alone, but as part of a wider ecosystem, provide self-assessments and knowledge, and guide employees to the appropriate resources and programs their employer is already paying for.

Case in point: Gymshark, an internationally recognized, up-and-coming fitness apparel brand, recognized the need for a proactive, whole-person whole-organization and scientifically backed employee mental health platform. Specifically, it needed to empower and engage its millennial staff. Gymshark has seen an impressive engagement increase in:

Where to go from here

Not sure where to start? A good beginning — and a place where brokers can help — is for employers to:

Retire ROI and discover VOI. It’s time to measure the value of employee mental health solutions in a way that has better odds of proving their worth and of gaining acceptance throughout any organization. That means making the case for the value of employee mental health programs — and selling that argument up the ladder.

Read more: