Back in 2019, an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals case offered key insight about "cross-plan off-setting." Without directly ruling on the matter, that Appellate Court sharply questioned whether ERISA permitted cross-plan offsetting. Now, a New Jersey District Court has directly held that cross-plan offsetting represents an ERISA fiduciary violation. [Lutz Surgical Partners, PLLC v. Aetna, Inc. 2021 WL 2549343 (D. N.J., June 21, 2021).]
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.