Harvard researchers have a new paper that suggests that states should "go big or go home" when it comes to considering public option insurance programs.
The paper, published in the Harvard Journal of Legislation, examines state public option programs from recent years, when states such as Nevada, Colorado and Washington have attempted to implement public option programs. Such programs provide a publicly financed health insurance program that supporters say can be less expensive for consumers while providing more competition with other plans.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
