How can retirement plan sponsors prepare for new IRS pre-examination pilot program?

The program gives employers an additional chance to identify operational errors and self-correct them after the plan has been targeted for audit.

By Natalie Miller | August 10, 2022 at 09:38 AM

Plan sponsors who are notified by the IRS of an upcoming audit will have a 90-day window to review, identify and in certain circumstances, correct any plan document or operational compliance errors it discovers. (Photo: Shutterstock)

In June 2022, the IRS launched a pre-examination pilot program for retirement plans that could help employers avoid costly penalties. The program aims to reduce the burden of, and time spent on, retirement plan audits, which are typically a time-consuming endeavor for plan sponsors. The program ultimately should be good news for plan sponsors in terms of both financial penalties and, presumably, a more efficient audit process.

The pre-examination program

Under this program, the IRS will notify retirement plan sponsors that the plan will be subject to an upcoming audit. Plan sponsors will then have a 90-day window to review, identify and in certain circumstances, correct any plan document or operational compliance errors it discovers. Plans that do not respond within the 90-day window will be subject to a full examination, so it is important for employers to quickly identify and address any issues.

Recommended For You

During this 90-day window, plan sponsors can self-correct any plan document or operational errors that are eligible for self-correction under the IRS's EPCRS Self-Correction Program guidance, which was most recently updated in Revenue Procedure 2021-30.

Plan sponsors may request a closing agreement for any errors that are ineligible for self-correction. Notably, however, if an error is self-identified through this pilot program, the IRS will utilize the Voluntary Correction Program (VCP) fee structure under EPCRS in determining the amount of any applicable financial sanction, rather than the Audit Closing Agreement Program (Audit CAP) fees typically assessed in a full examination. VCP fees are significantly lower than Audit CAP fees.

Once the IRS reviews the plan's response to the pre-examination inquiry, it will issue a closing letter if satisfied with the plan's actions, or determine whether it will conduct a limited or full scope audit.

Advantages over the standard audit process

Before the IRS implemented this pilot program, self-correction was only available to plans under audit in limited circumstances. Plans under audit were not eligible to correct under the VCP program. Thus, the program gives employers an additional chance to identify operational errors and self-correct them after the plan has been targeted for audit.

Action steps for employers that receive a pre-examination letter

  1. Contact ERISA counsel and consultants immediately to aid in plan document and operational review;
  2. Identify any potential plan document and/or operational errors;
  3. Work with ERISA counsel to determine the appropriate correction available for any identified errors;
  4. Work with ERISA counsel to respond to the IRS letter within the 90-day window.

Natalie Miller is an of counsel attorney at Spencer Fane LLP in the firm's Overland Park, Kansas, office. She advises benefit plan providers, administrators, and employers on matters related to ERISA and the Tax Code that impact employer sponsored benefit plans. She proactively helps clients navigate the complex regulatory requirements governing employee benefit plans by partnering on an array of matters including day-to-day plan administration, plan governance and correction of operational issues.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

By Paul Wilson and Lily Peterson | April 16, 2025

In this episode, we're joined by Stephanie Koch, director of human resources at Hendry Marine. We talk about the current state of HR, what she wishes benefits advisors knew, and details her journey from status quo benefits to the world of self-funding.

Confessions of an HR executive with Stephanie Koch

By Chelsea Ryckis and Donovan Ryckis | April 10, 2025

Our session at the BenefitsPRO Expo in Boston on May 6th, “Advisors Then, Now, and Next: Navigating the Changing Landscape of Healthcare Consulting,” will take a deep dive into how the advisory profession has evolved and where it’s headed next.

Benefits advisor evolution: Are you ready for what’s next? (Expo Preview)

By Paul Wilson and Lily Peterson | April 02, 2025

For our first episode, we're joined by Chelsea Ryckis, the 2024 BenefitsPRO Advisor of the Year and co-founder of Ethos Benefits. She shares her thoughts on the current state of employee benefits, how transparency and fiduciary shifts are impacting advisors and employers, her favorite music (kind of...) and more!

Unshakeable Confidence with Chelsea Ryckis
How One Employer Helped 1 in 3 Employees Improve Blood Pressure link

Case Study

Sponsored by Labcorp

High blood pressure affects nearly half of U.S. adults, increasing the risk of heart disease and stroke. This case study explores how an employer-sponsored wellness program helped approximately 1 in 3 employees improve their blood pressure risk level.

Reducing Employee Onboarding Time and Solving Staffing Challenges link

Case Study

Sponsored by Labcorp

Long onboarding times and staffing shortages create costly delays. Discover how one large healthcare system streamlined its hiring process, reducing onboarding time from weeks to days while improving the candidate experience and freeing up internal staff.

Opt In or Opt Out: Solving the Problem of Low Employee Engagement in Passive Voluntary Benefit Enrollments link

White Paper

Sponsored by Trustmark Voluntary Benefits

Voluntary benefit elections are not what they used to be. The shift toward passive enrollments prevents employees from being actively engaged in the enrollment process, generating low participation rates and putting employers and insurers at risk. This guide explores a new approach to enrollment that combines facets of both traditional enrollment processes and the new self-service culture to increase engagement and boost participation.