The breakdown is significant because in Pennsylvania employers and carriers facing workers' compensation litigation are not entitled to subrogate loss of consortium claims to the spouses of injured workers. (Credit: Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock) The breakdown is significant because in Pennsylvania employers and carriers facing workers' compensation litigation are not entitled to subrogate loss of consortium claims to the spouses of injured workers. (Credit: Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock)

A workers' compensation insurance carrier was unable to undo a $1.4 million third-party settlement, despite arguments that it wasn't given a full hearing to contest the breakdown of the accord, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Max Mitchell

Max Mitchell is ALM's Regional Managing Editor for The Legal Intelligencer, New Jersey Law Journal, Delaware Business Court Insider and Delaware Law Weekly. Follow him on Twitter @MMitchellTLI. His email is [email protected].