Pills in bottle

Legal analysists are calling a recent court ruling a win for pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and self-funded health insurance plans, with an appeals court ruling that PBM structures such as requiring the use of mail-order pharmacies cannot be restricted by state law.

The case, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) v. Mulready, centered on Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and its preemption of state laws. ERISA allows the federal government to set uniform standards for retirement and health plans in the country, avoiding a patchwork quilt of health care regulations.

However, there is debate on how much ERISA covers in the complex field of health care regulation, and states have been fighting to impose some regulations in areas where innovations have taken place, such as the partnerships between self-funded plans and PBMs. In an earlier ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma had ruled that the challenged provisions of Oklahoma's 2019 Patient's Right to Pharmacy Choice Act were not preempted by ERISA.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.