A recent focus group exercise showed that consumers may prefer a more generous emergency savings benefit option for possible financial emergencies.
The exercise by Commonwealth, a national financial nonprofit, took a close look at two provisions in the recent SECURE 2.0 Act. Those provisions specifically address an issue that has hampered retirement savings for some workers—emergency expenses.
When workers draw from retirement accounts such as 401(k)s, they can incur penalties as well as reduce the amount of retirement savings that they have. The SECURE 2.0 Act attempted to lessen that impediment on retirement savings by allowing employers to offer two options, a $1,000 annual benefit (to be repaid within three years) taken from their retirement account without penalties but subject to income tax; or a "pension-linked emergency savings account" (PLESA), capped at $2,500, which they contribute to through paycheck withdrawals, and which is matched by employers.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to BenefitsPRO, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited BenefitsPRO content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking benefits news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical converage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
