Construction firm Bechtel wins 401(k) ‘excessive fees’ lawsuit, again
A federal judge has dismissed – for the second time – a lawsuit against Bechtel Global that alleged the $5.7 billion plan's default managed account investment led to excessive fees and subpar returns, arguing that a target date fund would have been a better alternative.
By Lynn Cavanaugh |
January 16, 2025 at 11:07 AM
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A Virginia federal judge has dismissed – for the second time – a lawsuit against engineering and construction firm Bechtel Global Corp. that argued that the company’s retirement plan fiduciaries “breached their fiduciary duty” because the firm’s default managed account option was no better than a target date fund.
U.S. District Judge Anthony J. Trenga of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia tossed the lawsuit last week, marking the second dismissal of retiree Debra Hanigan’s case. She alleged that Bechtel’s choice of a managed account for its Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plan default investment led to excessive fees and subpar returns, arguing that a target date fund (TDF) would have been a better alternative.
It’s no secret, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a transformational force. And it’s already reshaping HR. Explore the ways AI is revolutionizing HR and practical strategies to make your team more strategic and engaging.
AI isn’t just poised to reshape workflows for benefit brokers - it already is. This paper explores why AI is a force multiplier for benefits advisors, and how it can increase your profits while enabling more personalized outcomes for clients.