Over the last few weeks, federal employees have been faced with an unsettling reality—department shutdowns, layoffs, and a wave of "deferred resignations." These buyouts, designed to reduce workforce costs, require employees to decide by February 6 whether to accept severance through September 30. While the program may seem like a cost-saving measure on the surface, its execution raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and long-term impact.

The government has much to learn from corporate America’s workforce strategies—both its successes and failures. Private-sector companies that implement layoffs or voluntary severance programs recognize that how employees are treated during transitions affects morale, retention, and future hiring. If the government wants to maintain its reputation as a stable employer, it must approach workforce reductions with a more strategic and employee-focused mindset.
|

What could the government do differently?

1. Internal redeployment should be an option

In corporate America, layoffs don’t always mean losing talent entirely. Many companies make efforts to redeploy employees to different departments where their skills are needed. This preserves institutional knowledge, stabilizes morale, and minimizes the financial and operational costs of hiring new workers down the line. The federal government should adopt a similar approach, encouraging employees in affected departments to apply for internal roles before resorting to buyouts. This would demonstrate a commitment to workforce sustainability rather than relying solely on cost-cutting measures.

2. Communication needs to be transparent and respectful

How an organization communicates difficult decisions reflects its values. In the corporate world, companies that handle layoffs with empathy and clarity tend to maintain trust with employees and the public. The federal government, however, often frames layoffs as a bureaucratic necessity, offering little in the way of human-centered communication. Employees deserve clear explanations, compassionate dialogue, and open forums for questions—not just an impersonal deadline to sign away their employment.